Rod Rosenbladt allows the Gospel to be the Gospel.

•April 27, 2009 • Leave a Comment

This portion is directly taken out of “The Gospel for Those Broken by the Church” by Dr. Rod Rosenbladt.  The page numbers are the page numbers of a booklet which was on the book rack provided by Oceanside United Reformed Church.

It seems to me that the key question here is a very basic one: Can the cross and blood of Christ save a Christian (failing as he or she is in living the Christian life) or no?

I hope that most of us would say that the shed blood of Christ is sufficient to save a sinner? All by itself, just Christ’s blood, “nude faith” in it, “sola fide”, “faith without works”, “a righteousness from God apart from law,” a cross by which “God justifies wicked people,” etc. So far so good, right?

But is the blood of Christ enough to save a still sinful-Christian? Or isn’t it? Does the Gospel still apply, even if you are a Christian? Or doesn’t it? It seems to me (1) that the category “sinner” still applies to me, (2) that the category “sinner” still applies to you, (3) that the category “sinner” still applies to all Christians. (If you are a Wesleyan and have reached perfection, what I have to say here doesn’t, of course apply to you.) But for the rest of us, it seems that what Luther said of the Christian being “simultaneously sinful and yet justified before the holy God” is critical. Is what Luther said Biblical? Or isn’t it? Is it Biblical to say that a Christian is “simul justus et peccator” or no? Are we Christians saved the same way we were when we were baptized into Christ, or when we came to acknowledge Christ’s shed blood and His righteousness as all we had in the face of God’s holy law? That all of our supposed “virtue” – Christian or pagan – is just like so many old menstrual garments (to use the Bible phrase)? But God imputes to those who trust Christ’s cross the true righteousness of Christ himself? We are pretty sure that unbelievers who come to believe this are instantly justified in God’s sight, declared as if innocent, adopted as sons or daughters, forgiven of all sin, given eternal life, etc. But are Christians still saved that freely? Or are we not? We are pretty clear that imputed righteousness saves sinners. But can the imputed righteousness of Christ save a Christian? And can it save him or her all by itself? Or no? I think the way we answer this question determines whether we have anything at all to say to the “sad alumni” of Christianity.

We Lutheran pastors haven’t done a great job of getting across the central nature of righteousness by imputation alone. I hope you’ve done a better job at it than we have!

Decades ago, a gigantic survey of our clergy and laity showed that we Lutheran pastors hadn’t even convinced our own members of the sufficiency of Christ’s cross and blood and death for them! (And I mean Lutheran members who might never have sneaked out to attend some evangelical revival, might never have spent 5 minutes watching crazy Trinity Broadcasting Network). Proof: A Study of Generations [results: 75% gave perfect Roman Catholic answers!]

• “When you die, are you sure you will enter heaven? [“I hope so.”]

• “I was president, tithed, sang in the choir, taught Sunday School,” etc.

• Perfect Roman Catholic answers! And this survey was done decades ago!

What the “sad alumni” need to hear (perhaps for the first time) is that Christian failures are going to walk into heaven, be welcomed into heaven, leap into heaven like a calf leaping out of its stall, laughing and laughing, as if it’s all to good to be true.

It isn’t just that we failures will get in. It’s that we will probably get in like that! We failures-in-living-the-Christian-life-as-described-in-the-Bible will probably say something like, “You mean it was that simple?!” “Just Christ’s cross & blood?! Just His righteousness imputed to my account as if mine? You gotta be kidding!” “And all of heaven is ours just because of what was done by Jesus outside of me, on the cross—not because of what Christ did in me” – in my heart, in my Christian living, in my behavior?! “Well, I’ll be damned!” But, of course, that’s the point isn’t it? As a believer in Jesus as your Substitute, you won’t be damned! No believer in Jesus will be. Not a single one!

• “Be of good cheer, my son. Your sins are forgiven.”

• “The Son of Man came not to be served, but to serve, and to give His life a ransom for many.”

• Fear not, little flock. It is your Father’s good pleasure to give you the kingdom.”

• “Come to Me, all you who are heavy laden. Take My yoke upon you, for My Yoke is easy and My burden is light.”

• “And He, when He comes, will neither break the bruised reed, nor quench the smoldering wick.”

• “When You return, remember me.” I tell you, this day yhou shall be with Me in paradise.”

• “It is finished!”

• “Christ redeemed us from the curse of the law by becoming a curse for us…” • “God made Him to be sin who Himself knew no sin…”

• “…for in Christ Jesus you are all sons of God, through faith. For as man of you as were baptized into Christ have put on Christ.”

• “For by grace you are saved, through faith, and that [faith in Jesus is] not of yourselves, but it is a gift of God, lest any man should boast.” • “And to the man who does not work but trusts the One who justifies the wicked, his faith is counted as if it were righteousness.” • “For we maintain that a man is justified by faith, apart from works of the law.”

• “….knowing a man is not justified by works of the law but through faith in Jesus Christ.” • “But now a righteousness of God has been manifested apart from the law,…the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all who believe.”

• “Therefore, since we have been justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ.” • “There is now, therefore, no condemnation for those who are in Christ Jesus.”

(pages 18-21, 27-28).

In Living Color by Danny Hyde

•April 25, 2009 • 1 Comment

Danny Hyde has written an excellent piece on a very misunderstood subject. Through effective combination of biblical, theological, and confessional discussions, he has presented the Reformed view of the second commandment winsomely and attractively. He helpfully emphasizes not the negative prohibition of making images of God but the positive facts that God has revealed himself now so generously in Word and Sacrament and will one day reveal himself visibly in the most perfect and authentic way.

David VanDrunen, Robert B. Strimple Associate Professor of Systematic Theology and Christian Ethics, Westminster Seminary California

Here is the link to the Amazon page: http://www.amazon.com/Living-Color-Images-Christ-Means/dp/0979367735/ref=sr_1_7?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1240578164&sr=1-7

For the Table of Contents and Endorsements see this page: http://dannyhyde.squarespace.com/journal/2009/4/24/announcing-in-living-color-images-of-christ-and-the-means-of.html

Next Up On the WHI: If Christ is Not Risen

•April 13, 2009 • Leave a Comment

(Q.) Is There Such a Thing as a First Class Christian? (A.) NO!

•April 12, 2009 • Leave a Comment

The White Horse discuss this question here.

It’s a fruitful discussion titled Spiritual Gifts. They’re going through 1 Corinthians 12-13.

Raised for Our Justification at Johannes Weslianus

•April 7, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Full Blog Post Here.

“This can be explained by a familiar comparison. The death of Jesus Christ is the payment of our debt. His resurrection is the receipt. Does a receipt add more to the payment? No. It presupposes it as made and accomplished. What does it do, then? It certifies the payment, attests to it, and convinces everyone of the payment. It shuts the mouth of those who would like to contest it.

It is the same with the resurrection of the Savior. It does not add any merit or any satisfactory virtue to His death. But it’s an authentic document that powerfully attests that God has received the payment of our Surety, that He has agreed to it, that He is content with it, that we should not fear the investigations of His justice or the condemnations of His tribunal. And if the devil or our consciences present our sins again to us, this admirable receipt shuts their mouths and forces them to be silent.

This is just like what we say with a receipt of payment. It releases a debtor, although it is not itself the payment of the debt. In the same way, Paul is right to say that Christ was raised for our justification, for the remission of our sins, although this is not what obtained the pardon.”


(HT: Heidelblog)

A Great Quote at “I Need Jesus.”

•April 5, 2009 • Leave a Comment

What do you do with the person who says, “I’ve asked God to forgive me about this, but I still feel guilty”? I hear that statement over and over again.

Sproul: I usually say to these people, “If you still feel guilty, then pray to God again. But this time don’t ask him to forgive you for the sin that is haunting you. Rather, ask him to forgive you for insulting his integrity by refusing to accept his forgiveness. Who are you to refuse to forgive yourself when God has forgiven you? When God promises to forgive his people when they repent, he is not playing games.  If he says he will forgive you, then he will forgive you.  And if God forgives you, you are forgiven.” It is often a difficult thing to accept the grace of God. Our human arrogance makes us want to atone for our own sins or to make it up to God with works of super-righteousness. But the fact of the matter is that we can’t make it up to God. We are debtors who cannot pay. That’s what justification by faith is all about.

-R.C. Sproul

HT: Roy Kil


Talk of the Imputation of the Active Obedience of Christ

•April 5, 2009 • Leave a Comment

Talk of Law and Gospel on the White Horse Inn

•April 1, 2009 • Leave a Comment

A great discussion on the Holy Law and the triumphal indicative on the White Horse Inn.

Michael Horton: Now when we are talking especially about the third use of the law.  Is it important to ground this particularly in the distinction between indicative and imperative?

Kim Riddlebarger: Absolutely.

Michael Horton: You talk about not imposing things on the text, you actually have Greek moods in the text that are indicatives and imperatives it’s a form of… Kim Riddlebarger: An indicative is a statement of fact…

Rod Rosenbladt: Christ has died for you, carried your sin in His body on the tree it will count before the Father at the end all these things are true whether you believe them or not!

Michael Horton: Therefore…

Kim Riddlebarger: Therefore…  I’m always amazed in the book of Romans for example when Paul moves from his discussion of Justification in chapter 3, 4, and 5 into some would consider his discussion on sanctification in 6 through 8. The first imperative in chapter 6 is “reckon yourselves dead to sin, but alive to God.” The first command is to consider your Justification. That’s the basis for any sanctification is to consider yourself dead to what you were in Adam, and alive to what you are in Christ!

Ken Jones: I love Colossians 1. He sets forth everything we have in Christ: You have been translated to the Kingdom of His Son, you have been conformed…you have all of these things. And then later in chapter 3 he goes on to say: Now put to death the members which are upon the earth. Now if you begin in chapter 3 and think you could work back to chapter 1 you will die of depression.

Michael Horton: I remember growing up how Romans 6 just scared me to death because I was raised with the carnal Christian teaching, you know you could be a first class Christian and go to heaven up in the front of the plane—live in victory, or you could sort of get in by the hair of your chinny, chin, chin.

Kim Riddlebarger: The self is still on the throne. Michael Horton: Your carnal Christian. And of course no Christian, no one who really is dwelt by the Holy Spirit wants to be a carnal Christian, so your striving to get into that upper region, and Romans 6 was the victorious Christian life. Romans 7 was the defeated Christian life or the carnal Christian—it’s not the same Paul at the same time, it’s two different stages of a persons life as a victorious Christian or as a carnal Christian. The thing that was just revolutionary for the Christian life was not only Justification but realizing too that Sanctification was by the Grace of God, and that Sanctification was rooted in the triumphant indicative when Paul says [in Romans 6], “Shall we then sin that grace may abound?” He doesn’t say, either on one hand, “Sure, God likes to forgive and I like to sin, that’s a great relationship.” Nor does he say on the other hand “You better not unless you want to be a victorious Christian.” What he says is you cannot! It is impossible for you to be carnal Christian. It is impossible!

Ken Jones: Because you have died to sin!

Michael Horton: You have died. I’ve buried you with Christ. I raised you up, it’s done, get over it, stop trying to walk around in grave clothes.

Kim Riddlebarger: Well, the great change in Romans 8 that theology produces because if your in the carnal Christian Romans 8 then sets out the option of walking in the flesh or walking in the Spirit, when the contrast is between all Christians who walk in the Spirit versus all those in Adam will and can only walk in the flesh. And once you are freed from that now you make real progress in the Christian life. Rod Rosenbladt: Yeah, ironically when that victorious life teaching has its stake put through its vampire heart it becomes possible in following what we are discussing in Romans. Finally it becomes possible to maybe hear the Law and have a shot at it, you know, to fight the fight.

Michael Horton: That’s right, yeah exactly.

Ken Jones: Because now you have the victory—the real victory which is Romans 8:1 “There is therefore no condemnation for those who are in Jesus Christ.”

Michael Horton: Yeah. Rod Rosenbladt: Right on.

Michael Horton: Anytime you hold out victory as a reward for my personal performance whatever kind of victory it is, I’m going to eventually become a Pharisee or…

Rod Rosenbladt and Michael Horton: …suicidal.

Michael Horton: but the alternative isn’t “Oh, we get a free seat in heaven and obedience doesn’t matter.” The alternative is to obey from freedom.

Kim Riddlebarger: The person that I get is the person who has been to every church, gone to every seminar, read every book, and still has some sin or some struggle that has them in what they think is a death grip. And they are wondering “Am I a Christian because I still keep doing this. I try and stop it. I can’t or I don’t seem to make much progress.” That’s the person I get. Michael Horton: That’s got to be the biggest pastoral problem.

Kim Riddlebarger: That is the biggest pastoral problem. You have people who kick up their heels and do all kinds of unholy things in the name of Christ and they need to be disciplined and dwelt with but that is not…

Rod Rosenbladt:…that is not the major problem

Kim Riddlbarger: The major category is somebody who’s been in the church for a long time, and who is seriously questioning God’s favor toward them because of their miserable performance and obedience to the Law.

Rod Rosenbladt: Yup.

Kim Riddlebarger: And as more Pastors try to deal with that by making sanctification more of an emphasis and stressing the need to get beyond that by trying this and trying that the more frustrated people become.

Michael Horton: One of the things that we ought to take a look at is the way in which the Law is distinguished from the Gospel in various ways. I know that both of our traditions, Reformed Confessions and Lutheran Confessions, and our dogmatics basically say the same thing. Here’s a quote and I betcha Rod this is right out of what you guys would say too. Zacharias Ursinus commentary on the Heidelberg Catechism:

“The doctrine of the church is the entire and uncorrupted doctrine of the Law and the Gospel concerning the true God together with His will, works and worship. This is the whole doctrine of the Church can be subdivided into two parts…The doctrine of the church consists of two parts: the Law, and the Gospel; in which we have comprehended the sum and substance of the sacred Scriptures…Therefore, the Law and Gospel are the chief and general divisions of holy scriptures, and comprise the entire doctrine comprehended therein…For the Law is our schoolmaster to bring us to Christ constraining us to fly to Him and showing us what that righteousness is which he has brought out and now gives to us. But the Gospel professedly treat of the person, office, and benefits of Christ. Therefore we have in the Law and Gospel the whole of the Scriptures comprehending the doctrine revealed from heaven for our Salvation. The Law prescribes and enjoins what is to be done and forbids what ought to avoided whilst the Gospel announces the free remission of sin through and for the sake of Christ alone. The Law is known within us by nature. The Gospel is divinely revealed outside of us in His Word. The Law promises life upon the condition of perfect obedience. The Gospel on the condition of faith in Christ and commencement of new obedience.

“This transcription of “Rightly Dividing the Word: Law and Gospel” is a
broadcast of the White Horse Inn radio program that originally aired on May
22, 2005 and is posted with permission. The White Horse Inn exists to equip
Christians to “know what you believe and why you believe it.” For more
information about the White Horse Inn, please visit www.whitehorseinn.org or
call (800) 890-7556.”

“The sweetest part of Christ is oft conceal’d”

•March 30, 2009 • Leave a Comment

From anti-evangelic aphorisms;

A legal spirit may be justly nam’d

The fertile womb of ev’ry error damn’d.

Hence Pop’ry, so nat’ral since the fall,

Makes legal works like saviours merit all;…

Hence dare Arminians too, with brazen face,

Give man’s free-will the throne of God’s free grace;

Whose self-exalting tenets clearly shew

Great ignorance of law and gospel too…

Christ is not preach’d in truth, but in disguise,

If his bright glory half absconded lies.

When gospel-soldiers, that divide the word,

Scarce brandish any but the legal sword.

While Christ the author of the law they press,

More than the end of it for righteousness;

Christ as a seeker of our service trace,

More than a giver of enabling grace.

With legal spade the gospel-field he delves,

Who thus drives sinners in unto themselves;

Halving the truth that should be all reveal’d,

The sweetest part of Christ is oft conceal’d.

-Ralph Erskine an 18th century Scottish Presbyterian and Minister

The Use and Misuse of Christian Liberty

•March 30, 2009 • Leave a Comment

The White Horse Inn has a brief series on 1 Corinthians.  Listen to it here.